Let's stop poisoning insects

We can phase out pesticides: speak up

We've got a chance to tell Government and industry to prioritise alternatives to pesticides and to see pesticides phased out for the long term. This only comes around once every five years - so now's the time to speak up for wildlife. 

Take action now

Your views can help.

The UK and devolved Governments are consulting on a new draft National Action Plan for pesticides (NAP), which is designed to deliver on their commitments to reduce pesticide use, and identify areas where they can be more ambitious in the future.

Unfortunately, it's not there yet. If nature is to have any hope of a safe and healthy recovery, the NAP needs a few changes - including adding a target around reducing the overall use of pesticides. We want to see this important plan reconfirm the Government's commitments to phasing out pesticides, and halt the unnecessary use of pesticides in public places; parks; verges; homes and gardens.

Did you know that the area of land treated with pesticides in the UK each year is almost 3 times the size of the UK itself*

That figure doesn't include the chemicals used in our communities, local parks, or roadside verges. Or the chemicals we use in our homes and gardens or which get poured down our drains! 

Most of this is totally unnecessary. And it's impacting on our insects at an alarming rate. 

Pesticide use affects us all. We can all take steps in our daily lives to lessen the devastating impacts chemicals like these have on wildlife. But government leadership and strong, integrated policies and laws are crucial to guide the way 

Our form makes it easy for you to respond, and share your views with the consultation team. 

More details to help your response >>

Question 27 in the draft NAP invites the public to add any further comments about the use of pesticides in the UK - this is the part of the consultation you are responding to. 

Insects pollinate a third of all our food crops. Much of our wildlife relies on them for food - be it birds, bats, reptiles, amphibians, small mammals or fish. But  41% of the Earth's remaining insect species are threatened with extinction**. In the UK alone we've lost at least 50% of our insects since 1970. 

So we really want the draft NAP to: 

  • Commit to seeing a reduction in the environmental impacts of pesticide use 

While the UK Government had previously set out this aim in 2018 (via the 25 Year Plan) the draft NAP only commits to “establishing a clear set of targets for reducing the risks associated with pesticide use”.  This could arguably be achieved by (for example) increasing regulatory visits to farms or introducing stricter disposal measures... but that wouldn't be enough to reverse wildlife declines. The NAP is not meant to be about 'reducing the risks associated', but reducing the impacts of pesticides overall.

  • Commit to phasing out pesticides use in certain areas, or to phasing out pesticides known to harm wildlife and human health

The NAP identifies the need to reduce the risks to wildlife and humans posed by pesticide use, yet it doesn't set out how to phase out pesticides in our towns, our cities, our homes and our gardens; or how to phase out chemicals known to have significant environmental and human health risks; nor commit to regulate the use of pesticides where the risks are unknown.

  • Do much more to support Integrated Pest Management

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is an approach to managing pests, diseases, or weeds in which chemical pesticides are used only as a last resort, if at all. IPM practices focus on farming practices where farmers work with nature to control unwanted ‘pests’ which is good for their business and vital for nature’s recovery. One of the goals for the NAP is to ‘promote the uptake of IPM’ - so it needs to make it clear that IPM is expected to be the norm.

  • Be more specific about how current protections will be maintained, and the basis on which decisions around authorised pesticide use will be made

All regulatory decisions on pesticides are now the responsibility of Defra, the Welsh Government, and the Scottish Government. The NAP commits to: (a) maintaining current protections; (b) basing regulation on the best available scientific knowledge; (c) following the precautionary principle where there is uncertainty over levels of risk. But the lack of detail around how these will be guaranteed (especially in light of Defra’s recent lift of the ban on a dangerous neonicotinoid for sugar beet) undermines all three commitments.  


The consultation closes on 26 February.   


**Sanchez-Bayo & Wyckhuys 2019  

1.Comment 2.Check 3.Send

Pesticides are not helping nature

Defra is making a plan to "reduce the risks of pesticide use". It should aim to reduce the impacts of pesticides and help reverse insect declines.

Do you agree? Use our form and respond to the consultation


Be assured we will protect your data. You can update your preferences at any time. 

Nature scene in silhouette